Ironically the woke western philosophy and ideology mirrors itself in the critique of any attempt of preserving tradition, stability, prosperity, security, identity, freedom, property, sovereignty, justice, reality and truth.
The narcissistic woke western intellectual contempts and is gaslighting any natural human rights and needs for existence.
Western wokeism is evil and dangerous because it is actively covert poisoning of the mindset of the soldiers worshipping the Devil.
He does have a point about the intellectual navel-gazing.
The rest of it, is pretty basic radical-right modernist thinking. Most of it resting on the assumption that his modernist-nationalistic worldview is actually the “true European tradition”. So many moments where he states his own axioms, presenting them as patently true. Upon examination, Faustian man appears, forgetting that the true origins of the West was the East, anyways.
There's a definite issue with intellectual and individualistic approach and attitude, which is correctly criticised. "Tradition" is a process and a lived experience of a people, not a mere personal preference. Modernity has disarmed its critics by wholly incorporating them into its praxis and language, so even those who rally against it are ensnared in it thoroughly.
Here lies the question- are we capable of authentic living, in line with our civilisational heritage, or are we deluding ourselves? I think that we are still far from developing a way forward that doesn't carry with itself the hypocrisy that is pointed out in the piece.
Excellent essay.
Ironically the woke western philosophy and ideology mirrors itself in the critique of any attempt of preserving tradition, stability, prosperity, security, identity, freedom, property, sovereignty, justice, reality and truth.
The narcissistic woke western intellectual contempts and is gaslighting any natural human rights and needs for existence.
Western wokeism is evil and dangerous because it is actively covert poisoning of the mindset of the soldiers worshipping the Devil.
Hmmm.
He does have a point about the intellectual navel-gazing.
The rest of it, is pretty basic radical-right modernist thinking. Most of it resting on the assumption that his modernist-nationalistic worldview is actually the “true European tradition”. So many moments where he states his own axioms, presenting them as patently true. Upon examination, Faustian man appears, forgetting that the true origins of the West was the East, anyways.
There's a definite issue with intellectual and individualistic approach and attitude, which is correctly criticised. "Tradition" is a process and a lived experience of a people, not a mere personal preference. Modernity has disarmed its critics by wholly incorporating them into its praxis and language, so even those who rally against it are ensnared in it thoroughly.
Here lies the question- are we capable of authentic living, in line with our civilisational heritage, or are we deluding ourselves? I think that we are still far from developing a way forward that doesn't carry with itself the hypocrisy that is pointed out in the piece.